Manipulation and influence are similar in many ways, but they differ in a few key areas. These differences are what make influencing people much more acceptable than manipulating people. I feel like the key difference between manipulation and influence is that when you manipulate someone you get them to do or feel something that they really do not want. Manipulation toys with someone's emotions and beliefs in order to achieve something that the person would never choose otherwise. Many times there are threats, or other unfavorable consequences associated with manipulation.
Influence is similar to manipulation in that many times it does involve bringing someone's emotions and other beliefs into the equation. But with influence, you try to convince someone that a certain choice or action is the best one for them. Influencing does not involve threatening people. Instead it involves showing them that the most favorable outcome will result from a specific course of action. Sometimes influence can be used for more unethical reasons, and this is when influence turns into manipulation. When someone is being influenced they still have the final say in what they will do. But when someone is being manipulated they lose that final say because their thoughts and ideas have been corrupted in some way by the manipulator.
In some situations it can become hard to distinguish between manipulation and influence. At work it is important to play the politics game, so that you can make allies and make sure not to upset the wrong people. But this is different than intentionally misleading people for your own personal gain. For me the line between influence and manipulation is the point where the person being influenced is no longer thinking for themself. As long as the person being influenced still makes his or her own decision at the end of the day, then it is completely ethical. But when that person's decision is severely affected by thoughts planted in their head by others, ethics become a concern.
One of the most important core values to me is that I do not want to make anyone do anything that they really do not want to do. So manipulating someone would be strongly against my core values. Despite this, I feel like I am pretty good at influencing people when I want them to see something in a different way. When I influence people I try to make them see a situation from a different point of view, and hope that this could start the process of changing their mind. I may try to use someone's emotions to help this process, but I never try to make someone do something that they do not think is a good idea themselves. As a result I feel like I stay true to my core values, even when I try to influence people to see things differently.
Eric,
ReplyDeleteIn most cases, the people who are being manipulated are not aware of it. Hence, they would not have any negative emotions while being manipulated. It is only when they discover that they were manipulated they will have such emotions. In plain terms, you get "mad as hell" after you discover that you were "taken for a ride." Perhaps, you are referring to an extreme case of manipulation, such as blackmail, where you would indeed know that you were being blackmailed, and you would definitely be mad while being manipulated.
Onder,
ReplyDeleteI do agree with you in most cases, but there are certain situation where the individuals are powerless and know they are being manipulated but have no say in the matter. But, i guess if you know about it, does it really even mean that you are being manipulated.....
Take Nazi germany for example... Hitler influenced and manipulated an entire country into believing that if you weren't pure white you were less human... Im sure many may have thought this was true, but there were many others who new his ideology was "horse shit" but if they defied the dictator would have been killed along with their families. so they had to deal with it or face certain death or escape to another country.
( hope you arent offended by the example (im jewish btw).. not sure if it even makes sense....)
Eric,
ReplyDeleteI think we are in agreement. I always wondered what proportion of Germans believed in Hitler's "vision" (and followed him voluntarily) and what proportion did not believe in it (but, had to follow him out of fear).
There is nothing to be offended about in what you said. I was born muslim, was married to a jew, and I am now married to a Greek orthodox. My Daughter just married a Catholic. I was born in Turkey, but my Mother-in-Law is Greek (and she loves me).
I am so happy to be an American and to be living in California. There are not many places in the world where you can be who you are and freely say what you think.
I would like to note that I am enjoying these discussions. May be I will start blogging...